Gunslinger: Battle Between Good and Evil :: essays research papers

The dilemma between good and evil began long forward our time, and its been chronicled since man could write. Stephen King, one of the controversial writers of our time, brings his characters to life by giving them peculiar attributes, individual and bold attitudes, and places them in unusual predicaments. The Gunslinger series by Stephen King is a sequence of books that show the internal struggle between good and evil. His character are presented with obstacles, and readers observe how each one responds to the challenges presented to them, waiting to knock against how far they will go to achieve what they believe is the greater good. King realistically conveys to his readers that although his characters put forth their best efforts to do what they feel is upright, their actions are non always in their best interests. The author clearly shows readers that no amount of good a person does can prevent them from getting hurt. In books one, two, and quaternion King puts his character s through certain situations to create certain outcomes. King collects an effort to show readers how people arrive at the right, or wrong choice, in divers(prenominal) situations. This is, of course, the classic struggle between good and evil.King introduces Roland, the protagonist, in Gunslinger. Roland is crucial in Kings endeavor to present to his readers how people misrepresent the choice between good and evil. In Gunslinger, Roland is presented with an option he can either save a boys life, or he can let the boy plunge to his death and not deviate from his plan. Roland loves the boy, Jake, and is torn between saving him and pursuing his target, the man in black. Roland decides to sacrifice his admirers life in order to hound the man in black. Rolands goal is to reach the Dark Tower, and he feels that he must make sacrifices and forgo the sentimental, in order to achieve his goal. His ultimate goal is what he believes is the greater good, and he will go to any length to reac h it. friendship has sacrificed of innocence to achieve their definitive purpose, history is proof of this. King simply brings this to light. Roland has love for the boy however, in not saving his life he saves to a greater extent lives in the end. Saving Jakes life might be in Jakes best interest, but in doing so Roland will be stirred negatively.